Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore/css changes #2466

Merged

Conversation

AVtheking
Copy link
Contributor

@AVtheking AVtheking commented Nov 24, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

refactoring color schemes for color blind people

Issue Number:

Fixes #
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

NO

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced new CSS variables for consistent styling across components.
    • Added new classes for buttons and layout enhancements in various screens.
    • Enhanced layout and styling for organization events and funds interfaces.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved button styling and hover effects for better user interaction feedback.
    • Enhanced validation and error handling for event creation.
  • Documentation

    • Updated import paths for styles to a centralized CSS module, enhancing maintainability.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined class names and structure in multiple components for improved readability and consistency.
  • Style

    • Enhanced visual presentation of buttons, modals, and input fields across the application.
    • Updated styles for dropdowns, tables, and other UI elements to improve responsiveness and maintainability.
    • Adjusted button colors and hover effects to enhance visual feedback based on active states.

dependabot bot and others added 6 commits November 14, 2024 10:53
Bumps [sass](https://github.com/sass/dart-sass) from 1.80.6 to 1.80.7.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/sass/dart-sass/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/sass/dart-sass/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](sass/dart-sass@1.80.6...1.80.7)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: sass
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…oesFoundation#2434)

Bumps [eslint-plugin-import](https://github.com/import-js/eslint-plugin-import) from 2.30.0 to 2.31.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/import-js/eslint-plugin-import/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/import-js/eslint-plugin-import/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](import-js/eslint-plugin-import@v2.30.0...v2.31.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: eslint-plugin-import
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…dation#2435)

Bumps [@mui/x-charts](https://github.com/mui/mui-x/tree/HEAD/packages/x-charts) from 7.22.1 to 7.22.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/mui/mui-x/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/mui/mui-x/blob/v7.22.2/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/mui/mui-x/commits/v7.22.2/packages/x-charts)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: "@mui/x-charts"
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…dation#2436)

Bumps [@types/react](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/tree/HEAD/types/react) from 18.3.3 to 18.3.12.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/releases)
- [Commits](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/commits/HEAD/types/react)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: "@types/react"
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a series of changes across multiple components and stylesheets, primarily focusing on updating CSS class names, restructuring import paths, and enhancing styling consistency through the use of CSS variables. Key components affected include AdvertisementRegister, EventCalendar, and various screens related to organization management. The changes aim to improve maintainability and visual presentation without altering the core functionality of the components.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/components/Advertisements/core/AdvertisementRegister/AdvertisementRegister.tsx Updated CSS module import path and modified class names for modal buttons and header.
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css Added CSS variables for colors, updated classes to use these variables, and introduced new button styles.
src/components/EventCalendar/EventHeader.tsx Updated button class names for styling consistency.
src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.tsx Changed button text colors and icon properties for active states.
src/components/LoginPortalToggle/LoginPortalToggle.module.css Added CSS variables and modified the .activeLink class to use new variables.
src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.module.css Introduced new CSS variables and updated styles for the .manageBtn class.
src/components/Venues/VenueModal.tsx Changed import path for styles and updated class names for buttons.
src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx Updated import path for styles and modified class names for buttons and inputs.
src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.module.css Introduced CSS variables and new button classes for improved styling.
src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx Updated button class names to utilize CSS modules instead of inline styles.
src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.module.css Modified button styles and added new layout classes.
src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.tsx Updated import path for styles and modified class names for visual consistency.
src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx Changed import path for styles and updated class names for buttons and inputs.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx Updated layout and styling of search and filter controls, refined DataGrid properties.
src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.module.css Added new classes for layout and styling, modified existing classes for color changes.
src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.tsx Enhanced validation and error handling in the createEvent function, updated modal structure.
src/screens/OrganizationFunds/FundModal.tsx Updated import path for styles and modified class names for buttons.
src/screens/OrganizationFunds/OrganizationFunds.tsx Changed import path for styles, updated button styles, and enhanced dataGridStyle object.
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx Updated button class for creating tags to include margin styling.
src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.tsx Changed import path for styles and updated class names for input fields and buttons.
src/screens/Requests/Requests.module.css Deleted file containing styles for request components.
src/screens/Requests/Requests.tsx Updated import path for styles and modified class names for layout adjustments.
src/style/app.module.css Modified variable definitions, added new classes, and enhanced media queries for responsive design.

Possibly related PRs

  • changed color schema for the tag and action item screen #2417: The changes in this PR involve updates to the ItemModal and ItemUpdateStatusModal components, including modifications to button class names and import paths for styles, which align with the changes made in the main PR regarding the AdvertisementRegister component's styling adjustments.
  • fixes #2094 : mobile screen responsive, fixed overflow  #2426: This PR focuses on enhancing the responsiveness of the OrganizationActionItems component, which includes layout adjustments similar to the structural changes made in the AdvertisementRegister component, particularly in managing overflow and styling for mobile screens.
  • feat!: Migrate Testing Framework from Jest to Vitest #2457: The migration of the testing framework from Jest to Vitest may indirectly relate to the main PR if any tests are affected by the changes in the AdvertisementRegister component, especially if they involve UI interactions or styling validations.
  • fix failing workflow of TS compilation #2472: This PR addresses workflow issues related to TypeScript compilation, which could be relevant if the changes in the main PR affect any TypeScript files or require adjustments in the compilation process due to new imports or styling changes.

Suggested reviewers

  • varshith257
  • pranshugupta54
  • palisadoes

🐰 In the meadow, changes bloom bright,
With styles that dance, a lovely sight.
From buttons to colors, all in a row,
A hop and a skip, watch the UI glow!
So let’s cheer for the code, with a joyful cheer,
For every small change brings us all near! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 24, 2024

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 28

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (32)
src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.module.css (1)

Line range hint 1-65: Consider implementing a comprehensive color system

Since this PR aims to improve accessibility for color-blind users, consider implementing a more comprehensive color system:

  1. Define semantic color variables (e.g., --color-primary, --color-text-primary)
  2. Include contrast-safe color combinations
  3. Document color usage patterns

This would make it easier to:

  • Maintain consistent accessible colors across the application
  • Test and verify color combinations
  • Make future accessibility improvements
src/components/EventCalendar/EventHeader.tsx (3)

Line range hint 58-62: Consider enhancing the search button's accessibility

While updating the CSS class, consider adding ARIA labels for screen readers and ensuring sufficient color contrast for the search icon.

 <Button
   className={styles.searchbutton}
   style={{ marginBottom: '10px' }}
+  aria-label="Search events"
 >
   <Search />
 </Button>

Line range hint 114-119: Improve color accessibility for the Create Event button

Since this PR focuses on color-blind accessibility, the variant="success" might not provide sufficient color contrast or distinction for color-blind users. Consider:

  1. Using a more accessible color scheme defined in your CSS modules
  2. Adding a visual indicator beyond just color (like an icon)
  3. Ensuring WCAG 2.1 compliant contrast ratios
 <Button
-  variant="success"
   className={styles.createButton}
   onClick={showInviteModal}
   data-testid="createEventModalBtn"
+  aria-label="Create new event"
 >
+  <i className="fas fa-plus-circle" aria-hidden="true"></i>
   Create Event
 </Button>

Line range hint 1-124: Consider implementing keyboard navigation improvements

While updating the styling for accessibility, it would be beneficial to enhance keyboard navigation between the search, dropdowns, and create button elements.

Consider implementing:

  1. Logical tab order
  2. Focus indicators
  3. Keyboard shortcuts for common actions
src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.module.css (1)

93-104: Improve button interactivity and accessibility

The email button needs hover and focus states for better user interaction feedback. Also, consider making the positioning more flexible.

.email_button {
  position: absolute;
  z-index: 10;
  bottom: 0;
  right: 0;
  height: 100%;
  display: flex;
  background-color: var(--search-button-bg);
  border-color: var(--search-button-border);
  justify-content: center;
  align-items: center;
+ transition: background-color 0.2s ease;
+ cursor: pointer;
}

+.email_button:hover,
+.email_button:focus {
+  background-color: var(--subtle-blue-grey-hover);
+  outline: 2px solid var(--subtle-blue-grey);
+  outline-offset: 2px;
+}
src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.module.css (3)

Line range hint 69-73: Resolve duplicate .sampleOrgSection class declaration

There are two declarations of .sampleOrgSection with different properties. This could lead to specificity issues and unexpected behavior.

Merge the declarations into a single class:

.sampleOrgSection {
  font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
  width: 100%;
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(1, 1fr);
  row-gap: 1em;
  justify-content: center;
  flex-direction: column;
  align-items: center;
}

Also applies to: 84-91


Line range hint 75-83: Standardize color values and enhance button accessibility

The button styles use inconsistent color formats (#707070 vs 'grey') and might need accessibility improvements.

Consider these improvements:

.sampleOrgCreationBtn {
  width: 100%;
  background-color: transparent;
-  color: #707070;
-  border-color: #707070;
+  color: var(--text-color, #555555);
+  border-color: var(--border-color, #555555);
  display: flex;
  justify-content: center;
  align-items: center;
}

.sampleHover:hover {
-  border-color: grey;
-  color: grey;
+  border-color: var(--hover-color, #707070);
+  color: var(--hover-color, #707070);
+  background-color: rgba(85, 85, 85, 0.1);
}

Consider:

  • Using CSS custom properties for consistent color management
  • Adding focus states for keyboard navigation
  • Ensuring sufficient contrast for text and borders

Also applies to: 92-95


Line range hint 1-1: Consider implementing a comprehensive color system

To better support accessibility and maintain consistency, consider implementing a systematic approach to colors:

  1. Create a central color palette using CSS custom properties:
:root {
  /* Primary colors */
  --color-primary: #555555;
  --color-primary-hover: #707070;
  
  /* Text colors */
  --text-primary: #555555;
  --text-secondary: #707070;
  
  /* Border colors */
  --border-primary: #555555;
  --border-secondary: #707070;
  
  /* States */
  --hover-background: rgba(85, 85, 85, 0.1);
}
  1. Document color contrast ratios and accessibility compliance
  2. Create a style guide for color usage in different UI components
src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.module.css (2)

Line range hint 247-264: Enhance loader visibility for color-blind users

The loader uses an orange color (#febc59) which might not be easily distinguishable for users with certain types of color blindness. Consider using a color with higher contrast or adding additional visual indicators.

.loader {
  /* ... other properties ... */
-  border-left: 1.1em solid #febc59;
+  border-left: 1.1em solid var(--loader-color, #2d5ba3);
+  /* Alternatively, consider adding animation scale or opacity changes */
}

Line range hint 1-383: Implement a comprehensive color accessibility system

To better achieve the PR's objective of improving accessibility for color-blind individuals, consider:

  1. Implementing a consistent color system using CSS variables
  2. Adding ARIA attributes for interactive elements
  3. Testing with color blindness simulation tools
  4. Following WCAG 2.1 Level AA guidelines for color contrast

Consider creating a separate color tokens file:

:root {
  /* Primary colors with accessible alternatives */
  --primary-color: #4a90e2;
  --primary-color-alt: #2d5ba3;
  
  /* Text colors with guaranteed contrast ratios */
  --text-primary: #2c2c2c;
  --text-secondary: #595959;
  
  /* Border colors with sufficient contrast */
  --border-light: #d1d3d8;
  --border-medium: #a4a6ac;
}
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css (1)

Line range hint 418-435: Add non-color indicators for event types

Currently, event types are distinguished solely by color, which isn't accessible for color-blind users. Consider adding patterns, icons, or labels to supplement the color coding.

 .orgEvent__color {
   height: 15px;
   width: 40px;
   background-color: rgba(82, 172, 255, 0.5);
   border-radius: 10px;
+  /* Add distinctive pattern */
+  background-image: linear-gradient(45deg, transparent 50%, rgba(0,0,0,0.1) 50%);
+  background-size: 10px 10px;
 }

 .holidays__color {
   height: 15px;
   width: 40px;
   background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.15);
   border-radius: 10px;
+  /* Add distinctive pattern */
+  background-image: linear-gradient(90deg, transparent 50%, rgba(0,0,0,0.1) 50%);
+  background-size: 10px 10px;
 }

 .userEvents__color {
   height: 15px;
   width: 40px;
   background: rgba(146, 200, 141, 0.5);
   border-radius: 10px;
+  /* Add distinctive pattern */
+  background-image: linear-gradient(0deg, transparent 50%, rgba(0,0,0,0.1) 50%);
+  background-size: 10px 10px;
 }
src/components/Venues/VenueModal.tsx (3)

165-165: Consider additional accessibility improvements

While updating the close button styling, consider adding the following accessibility enhancements:

  1. Add aria-label="Close modal" for screen readers
  2. Ensure the new color scheme provides sufficient contrast ratio
  3. Consider adding a visible text label alongside the icon for better clarity
 <Button
   variant="danger"
   onClick={onHide}
   className={styles.closeButton}
   data-testid="createVenueModalCloseBtn"
+  aria-label="Close modal"
 >
-  <i className="fa fa-times" />
+  <i className="fa fa-times" aria-hidden="true" /> 
+  <span className="visually-hidden">Close</span>
 </Button>

263-263: Enhance button accessibility and semantics

The class name change from greenregbtn to addButton is good for semantics, but consider these additional improvements:

  1. Add aria-busy={loading} for screen readers during submission
  2. Use semantic colors that work well for color-blind users
  3. Consider adding a loading spinner for visual feedback
 <Button
   type="submit"
   className={styles.addButton}
   value={edit ? 'editVenue' : 'createVenue'}
   data-testid={edit ? 'updateVenueBtn' : 'createVenueBtn'}
   onClick={handleSubmit}
   disabled={loading}
+  aria-busy={loading}
 >
-  {edit ? t('editVenue') : t('createVenue')}
+  {loading ? (
+    <>
+      <span className="spinner-border spinner-border-sm me-2" role="status" aria-hidden="true" />
+      {edit ? t('editingVenue') : t('creatingVenue')}
+    </>
+  ) : (
+    edit ? t('editVenue') : t('createVenue')
+  )}
 </Button>

Line range hint 1-274: Consider comprehensive accessibility improvements

While the color scheme changes are good, consider these additional accessibility improvements throughout the modal:

  1. Add proper form validation ARIA attributes
  2. Improve image upload feedback for screen readers
  3. Add descriptive labels for all interactive elements
  4. Ensure proper heading hierarchy in the modal

Example improvements for the image preview section:

 {venueImage && (
-  <div className={styles.preview}>
+  <div className={styles.preview} role="region" aria-label="Venue image preview">
     <img
       src={imageURL}
-      alt="Venue Image Preview"
+      alt={`Preview of ${name || 'venue'}`}
     />
     <button
       className={styles.closeButtonP}
       onClick={clearImageInput}
       data-testid="closeimage"
+      aria-label="Remove venue image"
     >
-      <i className="fa fa-times"></i>
+      <i className="fa fa-times" aria-hidden="true"></i>
+      <span className="visually-hidden">Remove image</span>
     </button>
   </div>
 )}
src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.tsx (1)

231-231: Consider using a distinct style class for action buttons.

Using styles.dropdown for an action button might not be semantically correct and could affect the visual hierarchy. Consider creating a dedicated style class for primary action buttons.

-className={styles.dropdown}
+className={styles.actionButton}
src/screens/OrganizationFunds/OrganizationFunds.tsx (2)

17-17: Consider documenting the color scheme migration

The migration to global styles aligns with improving color-blind accessibility. However, to ensure maintainability:

  • Document the color scheme choices and their accessibility considerations in the codebase
  • Consider adding color contrast validation tests

Line range hint 1-386: Consider adding ARIA attributes for enhanced accessibility

While the color scheme changes improve visual accessibility, consider these additional improvements:

  • Add aria-label to the search input
  • Ensure DataGrid announces sort state changes to screen readers
  • Add aria-expanded state to the dropdown
          <Form.Control
            type="name"
            placeholder={tCommon('searchByName')}
            autoComplete="off"
            required
            className={styles.inputField}
            value={searchTerm}
            onChange={(e) => setSearchTerm(e.target.value)}
            data-testid="searchByName"
+           aria-label={tCommon('searchByName')}
          />
src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx (2)

Line range hint 192-221: Consider more generic class names for better reusability

While the new class names are descriptive, they're too specific to this component. Consider using more generic names that can be reused across similar layouts.

-<div className={styles.btnsContainerBlockAndUnblock}>
-  <div className={styles.inputContainerBlockAndUnblock}>
-    <div className={styles.inputBlockAndUnblock}>
+<div className={styles.actionButtonsContainer}>
+  <div className={styles.searchInputContainer}>
+    <div className={styles.searchInputWrapper}>

Accessibility improvements needed for interactive elements

Several accessibility concerns need to be addressed:

  • The search button has tabIndex={-1} which removes it from keyboard navigation
  • Dropdowns have aria-expanded but lack other required ARIA attributes like aria-label or aria-controls
  • Form.Control lacks explicit label association and aria-label
  • No focus styles defined in the CSS module
  • Table headers lack aria-sort attributes despite having sorting functionality

Required changes:

  • Remove tabIndex={-1} from the search button
  • Add proper ARIA labels to dropdowns and their controls
  • Associate Form.Control with labels using htmlFor/id
  • Add focus styles in CSS
  • Add appropriate aria-sort to sortable table headers
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 192-346: Comprehensive accessibility verification needed

Since this PR focuses on improving accessibility for color-blind users, please ensure:

  1. All interactive elements have sufficient color contrast
  2. Color is not the only means of conveying information
  3. Focus indicators are visible
  4. Text remains readable with different color vision deficiencies

Consider using tools like Lighthouse or axe for automated accessibility testing.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any hardcoded colors that might bypass the accessibility improvements
echo "Checking for hardcoded colors..."
rg -i "color:|background:|border:" "src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx"

# Check for proper semantic HTML usage
echo "Checking semantic HTML..."
rg "<div.*role=" "src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx"

Length of output: 263


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for color-related CSS classes and styles
echo "Checking CSS imports and styles..."
rg -l "styles\." "src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx"
cat "src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.module.css" 2>/dev/null || true

# Check for accessibility attributes
echo "Checking accessibility attributes..."
rg -i "aria-|role=|tabindex" "src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx"

# Check form control elements
echo "Checking form controls..."
ast-grep --pattern 'Form.Control { $$$ }'

Length of output: 2111

src/style/app.module.css (4)

498-520: Improve table row state indicators for color-blind users

While the focus states are well-defined, the table row states rely heavily on color changes which might be insufficient for color-blind users.

Consider adding:

  1. Left border or icons to indicate active/hover states
  2. Subtle patterns or gradients
  3. Additional visual indicators beyond color
.custom_table tbody tr:hover {
   background-color: var(--grey-bg-color);
   box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
+  border-left: 3px solid var(--bs-primary);
+  position: relative;
}

.custom_table tbody tr:hover::before {
+  content: "►";
+  position: absolute;
+  left: -20px;
+  color: var(--bs-primary);
}

553-574: Enhance text and border contrast for better readability

The use of pure black text (#000000) and light borders might cause readability issues for some users.

Consider:

  1. Using a softer black for text
  2. Increasing border contrast
  3. Adding table row separators
.listTable {
   width: 100%;
   box-sizing: border-box;
   background: #ffffff;
-  border: 1px solid #0000001f;
+  border: 1px solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2);
   border-radius: 24px;
}

.requestsTable thead th {
   font-size: 20px;
   font-weight: 400;
   line-height: 24px;
   letter-spacing: 0em;
   text-align: left;
-  color: #000000;
+  color: #2d2d2d;
-  border-bottom: 1px solid #dddddd;
+  border-bottom: 2px solid #c4c4c4;
   padding: 1.5rem;
}

Line range hint 1-640: Recommend comprehensive color palette testing

To ensure the CSS changes truly improve accessibility for color-blind users, consider the following steps:

  1. Test the color palette with color blindness simulation tools
  2. Verify contrast ratios meet WCAG 2.1 standards
  3. Add visual patterns or icons to complement color-based indicators

Tools recommended:

  • WebAIM Contrast Checker
  • Colorblinding (Chrome extension)
  • Color Oracle (Desktop application)

Color variables need standardization and contrast improvements

Based on the verification results, there are several issues with color usage:

  1. Inconsistent color variable naming:

    • Multiple similar colors defined differently: --dropdown-hover-color, --grey-bg-color, --tablerow-bg-color
    • Bootstrap variables mixed with custom variables
  2. Potential contrast issues:

    • Direct usage of #fff and rgba(255, 255, 255, ...) without contrast checks
    • Light colors like #f8f9fa, #f2f2f2 used for text/backgrounds
  3. Hardcoded colors:

    • Many instances of hardcoded hex values like #31bb6b, #707070, #555555
    • Duplicate color definitions that could be consolidated into variables

Recommendations:

  • Consolidate duplicate colors into semantic variables
  • Use CSS custom properties with Bootstrap's color system
  • Ensure all color combinations meet WCAG contrast guidelines
  • Replace hardcoded colors with variables
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-640: Verify consistent color usage across the application

Let's ensure color variables are used consistently across all CSS files for maintaining accessibility standards.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for hardcoded colors and inconsistent variable usage

# Find all CSS files
echo "Checking for hardcoded colors in CSS files..."
rg -t css '#[0-9a-fA-F]{3,6}\b' --no-filename

# Check for color variable usage
echo "Checking for color variable usage..."
rg -t css 'var\(--.*color.*\)' --no-filename

# Check for potential contrast issues (looking for light colors)
echo "Checking for potential contrast issues..."
rg -t css '#[fF]{3,6}\b|rgba?\s*\(\s*255\s*,\s*255\s*,\s*255\b' --no-filename

Length of output: 52728

src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.tsx (1)

Line range hint 301-499: Consider additional accessibility enhancements

While the color-related changes improve accessibility, consider these additional enhancements:

  1. Add aria-invalid and aria-errormessage attributes to form fields when validation fails
  2. Add aria-describedby to connect error messages with form fields
  3. Consider adding aria-live regions for dynamic content updates

Example implementation:

 <Form.Control
   type="title"
   id="eventitle"
   placeholder={t('enterTitle')}
   autoComplete="off"
   required
+  aria-invalid={formState.title.trim().length === 0}
+  aria-errormessage="title-error"
   value={formState.title}
   onChange={(e): void => {
     setFormState({
       ...formState,
       title: e.target.value,
     });
   }}
 />
+ <div id="title-error" aria-live="polite">
+   {formState.title.trim().length === 0 && 'Title cannot be blank'}
+ </div>
src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.tsx (4)

Line range hint 344-356: Enhance search input accessibility

The search input uses a white background (bg-white) which may not provide sufficient contrast with the text color. Additionally, the search button relies solely on an icon without text, which might be difficult for some users to understand.

Consider these improvements:

-className={'bg-white'}
+className={`${styles.searchInput} bg-white`}
+aria-label={tCommon('searchByName')}

-<Search />
+<>
+  <Search aria-hidden="true" />
+  <span className="visually-hidden">{tCommon('search')}</span>
+</>

Line range hint 368-376: Improve dropdown accessibility for color-blind users

The dropdown uses color-based variants (success) to indicate state, which may be difficult for color-blind users to distinguish. Additionally, the selected state relies solely on color difference.

Consider these improvements:

-variant={sortingState.option === '' ? 'outline-success' : 'success'}
+variant="default"
+className={`${styles.dropdown} ${sortingState.option !== '' ? styles.dropdownSelected : ''}`}

Add to your CSS:

.dropdownSelected {
  /* Use patterns or icons in addition to color */
  background-image: url('checkmark.svg');
  background-repeat: no-repeat;
  background-position: right 8px center;
}

Line range hint 537-554: Enhance modal accessibility with better contrast

The modal uses white text and custom button styling which may not provide sufficient contrast or clear visual indicators for color-blind users.

Consider these improvements:

-className={styles.createButton}
+className={`${styles.modalHeader} ${styles.highContrast}`}

-className="text-white"
+className={styles.modalTitle}

-className={`btn ${styles.pluginStoreBtn}`}
+className={`btn ${styles.accessibleBtn} ${styles.pluginStoreBtn}`}
+aria-label={t('goToStore')}

Add visual indicators like icons or patterns to buttons in addition to color-based styling.


Line range hint 1-577: General accessibility improvements needed

While the styling changes are moving in the right direction, several accessibility enhancements could be made:

  1. Loading states: Add aria-busy and role="status" to shimmer elements
  2. Keyboard navigation: Ensure focus indicators are visible and not color-dependent
  3. Screen reader support: Add aria-labels to interactive elements
  4. Color independence: Use patterns, icons, or text to convey information, not just color

Consider implementing an accessibility testing suite using tools like axe-core or jest-axe to automatically verify these improvements.

src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx (2)

375-375: Add visual indicators for button states

The create button should have clear visual indicators beyond color for different states (hover, focus, active) to assist color-blind users.

Consider adding a distinct icon and/or border style:

-className={`${styles.createButton} mb-2`}
+className={`${styles.createButton} ${styles.primaryAction} mb-2`}

446-447: Enhance modal action button distinction

The modal's action buttons should be clearly distinguishable beyond color. Consider adding icons and ensuring sufficient spacing between opposing actions.

 <Button
   variant="secondary"
-  className={styles.closeButton}
+  className={`${styles.closeButton} me-3`}
   onClick={(): void => hideInviteModal()}
   data-testid="closeOrganizationModal"
 >
+  <i className="fa fa-times me-2" />
   {tCommon('cancel')}
 </Button>
 <Button
   type="submit"
   value="invite"
   data-testid="createPostBtn"
-  className={`${styles.addButton} mt-2`}
+  className={`${styles.addButton} ${styles.primaryAction} mt-2`}
 >
+  <i className="fa fa-check me-2" />
   {t('addPost')}
 </Button>

Also applies to: 554-565

src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx (2)

Line range hint 447-474: Enhance accessibility for form controls

Given that this PR focuses on accessibility improvements, consider adding proper ARIA labels and roles to form controls. Additionally, the password validation feedback should not rely solely on colors and icons.

Add ARIA attributes to improve accessibility:

 <Button tabIndex={-1} className={styles.email_button}
+  aria-label="Email input icon"
+  aria-hidden="true"
 >
   <EmailOutlinedIcon />
 </Button>

Also, consider adding text-based feedback for password validation that doesn't rely solely on colors:

 <span>
   <Clear />
+  <span className="sr-only">Requirement not met:</span>
 </span>

Line range hint 32-38: Strengthen security measures in authentication flow

While the basic security measures are in place, there are a few improvements that could be made:

  1. Consider rate limiting login attempts
  2. Move password validation logic to a separate utility function
  3. Add proper error boundaries around the authentication flow

Example utility function for password validation:

const validatePassword = (password: string): ValidationResult => {
  const checks = {
    length: password.length >= 6,
    lowercase: /[a-z]/.test(password),
    uppercase: /[A-Z]/.test(password),
    numeric: /\d/.test(password),
    special: /[!@#$%^&*()_+{}[\]:;<>,.?~\\/-]/.test(password)
  };
  
  return {
    isValid: Object.values(checks).every(Boolean),
    checks
  };
};

Also applies to: 447-523

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ff25183 and 8d43aae.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (25)
  • .github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1 hunks)
  • package.json (4 hunks)
  • src/components/Advertisements/core/AdvertisementRegister/AdvertisementRegister.tsx (4 hunks)
  • src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css (15 hunks)
  • src/components/EventCalendar/EventHeader.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/LoginPortalToggle/LoginPortalToggle.module.css (2 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.module.css (2 hunks)
  • src/components/Venues/VenueModal.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx (8 hunks)
  • src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.module.css (2 hunks)
  • src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx (4 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.module.css (2 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.tsx (6 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx (9 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.module.css (9 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationFunds/FundModal.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationFunds/OrganizationFunds.tsx (5 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.tsx (4 hunks)
  • src/screens/Requests/Requests.module.css (0 hunks)
  • src/screens/Requests/Requests.tsx (4 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (11 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/screens/Requests/Requests.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/screens/OrganizationFunds/FundModal.tsx (1)
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2064
File: src/screens/OrganizationFunds/OrganizationFunds.tsx:66-72
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: Renaming the Enum `Modal` to `ModalState` in the `organizationFunds` component is unnecessary and does not change the functionality.
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css

[error] 28-28: Unexpected shorthand property margin after margin-bottom

(lint/suspicious/noShorthandPropertyOverrides)

🔇 Additional comments (29)
src/components/LoginPortalToggle/LoginPortalToggle.module.css (1)

1-9: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility

While defining color variables improves maintainability, we need to ensure these colors meet WCAG accessibility guidelines for color-blind users. Please verify:

  1. Text contrast ratios against backgrounds
  2. Interactive element distinction (especially hover states)
  3. Consider adding comments documenting the contrast ratios

Consider using CSS custom properties with semantic names that include their purpose and contrast ratio, for example:

--interactive-bg-aa-contrast: #555555; /* 4.5:1 ratio */
src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.module.css (1)

1-4: Verify color accessibility compliance

While the introduction of CSS variables improves maintainability, please ensure the chosen colors meet WCAG accessibility guidelines for color-blind users, as this is a key objective of the PR.

Let's verify the color contrast ratios:

✅ Verification successful

Color variables are consistent with global theme and accessibility standards

The color variables defined in OrgListCard.module.css are already being used consistently across multiple components and match the project's global color scheme, as evidenced by identical color definitions in other CSS modules:

  • --grey-bg-color: #eaebef is used in app.module.css, LoginPage.module.css, and other components
  • --dropdown-border-color: #555555 is consistently defined across the application

The colors chosen show good accessibility considerations:

  • The grey background (#eaebef) is a light neutral shade suitable for color-blind users
  • The border color (#555555) provides sufficient contrast against light backgrounds with a ratio well above WCAG requirements
  • The project has accessibility testing infrastructure in place (dom-accessibility-api dependency and a11y configurations)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any color-related accessibility testing configurations or tools in the project

# Look for accessibility testing configurations
rg -g '*.json' -g '*.js' -g '*.yml' 'accessibility|a11y|wcag|contrast'

# Look for existing color definitions to ensure consistency
rg -g '*.css' ':root' -A 10

Length of output: 6539

src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.module.css (1)

1-17: Verify consistent color usage across the application

Let's ensure these color variables are used consistently across other CSS modules.

✅ Verification successful

Color variables are consistently defined and used across the application

Based on the comprehensive search results, I can verify that:

  1. The color variables defined in LoginPage.module.css are properly used across the application:

    • These variables are also defined in other key files like app.module.css and EventCalendar.module.css
    • The variables follow a consistent naming pattern (e.g., --dropdown-border-color, --grey-bg-color)
  2. The color system is well-structured:

    • Global Bootstrap color variables are defined in _variables.scss
    • Component-specific colors reference these global variables using the CSS var() function
    • Semantic color usage is consistent (e.g., --delete-button-color for destructive actions)
  3. The color values are consistently applied:

    • UI elements like buttons, borders, and backgrounds use the defined variables
    • When direct color values are used, they match the established color scheme
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for color usage consistency across CSS files

# Find all CSS module files
echo "Searching for color values in CSS files..."
rg -t css '(#[0-9a-fA-F]{3,6}|rgb|rgba|var\(--[^)]+\))' src/

Length of output: 100223

src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.module.css (1)

23-24: 💡 Codebase verification

Consistent color updates needed across the application

The color change from #31bb6b (green) to #555555 (grey) in OrgList.module.css is part of a larger accessibility improvement effort, but the search results show that #31bb6b is extensively used throughout the application. For consistent accessibility improvements:

  • The color #31bb6b is used in over 40 CSS files, including critical UI components like buttons, borders, and text
  • It's defined as a primary/success color variable in src/assets/scss/_variables.scss
  • Many Bootstrap component customizations in src/assets/css/app.css rely on this color

The color change should be:

  1. Applied consistently across all components using CSS variables
  2. Verified for WCAG compliance in all contexts (text, backgrounds, borders)
  3. Updated in the design system variables (_variables.scss)

Consider using a color contrast checker to verify the new grey (#555555) meets accessibility standards in all its use cases.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify color contrast ratio for accessibility compliance

The change from green (#31bb6b) to grey (#555555) needs to be evaluated for accessibility. While this change might help color-blind users, we should ensure:

  1. The contrast ratio meets WCAG 2.1 standards (minimum 4.5:1 for normal text)
  2. The button remains visually distinct enough from its surroundings

Consider:

  • Using CSS custom properties (variables) for consistent color management
  • Adding hover/focus states that provide additional visual feedback beyond color changes

Also applies to: 30-31

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any other instances of the old color (#31bb6b) that might need updating
rg -i "#31bb6b" --type css

Length of output: 12868

package.json (2)

149-149: LGTM: sass update aligns with PR objectives

The sass package update (^1.80.6 -> ^1.80.7) aligns with the PR's CSS-related changes for improving color-blind accessibility.


20-20: Verify security implications of dependency updates

The following dependencies have been updated:

  • @mui/x-charts: ^7.22.1 -> ^7.22.2
  • @types/react: ^18.3.3 -> ^18.3.12
  • eslint-plugin-import: ^2.30.0 -> ^2.31.0
  • sass: ^1.80.6 -> ^1.80.7

Let's verify if these updates include any security patches.

Also applies to: 122-122, 136-136, 149-149

✅ Verification successful

Dependencies updated are free from known security vulnerabilities

Based on the GitHub Security Advisory Database query results, none of the updated packages (@mui/x-charts, @types/react, eslint-plugin-import, sass) have any known security vulnerabilities. These appear to be routine patch/minor version updates.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for security advisories for the updated packages

echo "Checking for security advisories..."

for package in "@mui/x-charts" "@types/react" "eslint-plugin-import" "sass"; do
  echo "\nChecking $package:"
  gh api graphql -f query='{
    securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "'$package'") {
      nodes {
        advisory {
          summary
          severity
          publishedAt
        }
        vulnerableVersionRange
        firstPatchedVersion {
          identifier
        }
      }
    }
  }'
done

Length of output: 2120

src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css (1)

1-13: Evaluate color contrast ratios for accessibility

While centralizing colors using CSS variables is good, the chosen colors need to be verified for accessibility:

  1. The grey colors (#555555, #eaebef) should be tested for sufficient contrast
  2. The blue-grey variations might be difficult for color-blind users to distinguish
  3. Consider adding comments documenting WCAG compliance levels for each color

Let's verify the color contrast ratios:

Consider using a color system that:

  1. Provides preset accessible color combinations
  2. Includes color-blind safe palettes
  3. Documents contrast ratios in comments
src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.tsx (4)

150-150: LGTM! Improved accessibility through centralized styling.

The switch to styles.inputField allows for better control over input field styling, which is crucial for accessibility.


163-163: LGTM! Improved layout structure and consistent styling.

The flex container provides better responsiveness, and the consistent use of styles.dropdown across all dropdowns ensures visual uniformity.

Also applies to: 172-172, 208-208


158-161: Verify icon contrast ratio for accessibility.

While the move to styles.searchButton is good, ensure that the Search icon has sufficient contrast against the button background for optimal visibility.


Line range hint 1-277: Recommend manual accessibility testing.

While the styling changes look good, it would be valuable to perform manual testing with various color blindness simulation tools to ensure the new color scheme effectively improves accessibility.

src/screens/OrganizationFunds/FundModal.tsx (1)

176-176: Verify color contrast for close button

Since this PR focuses on color-blind accessibility, ensure the new closeButton class maintains sufficient color contrast ratios and includes non-color visual indicators (like the "×" icon).

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:

Close button meets accessibility standards

The closeButton class in app.module.css provides sufficient visual indicators and color contrast:

  • Uses semantic colors through CSS variables (--delete-button-color for text and --delete-button-bg for background)
  • Includes a visible "×" icon from Font Awesome
  • Has hover state with color inversion for additional visual feedback
  • Button is properly labeled with data-testid="fundModalCloseBtn" for testing/accessibility tools
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the color properties of the closeButton class
echo "Checking closeButton style properties:"
rg -A 5 "\.closeButton\s*{" src/style/app.module.css

Length of output: 239


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for closeButton style definition with fixed regex
echo "Checking closeButton style properties:"
rg "\.closeButton.*{" --type css

# Search in all style files to find the close button styles
echo -e "\nSearching in all CSS/SCSS files:"
fd -e css -e scss -x cat {}

Length of output: 123455


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for closeButton styles with fixed pattern and show surrounding context
echo "Checking closeButton styles:"
rg -U "\.closeButton\s*\{[^}]*\}" --type css -A 5

# Also check the specific file mentioned in the review
echo -e "\nChecking FundModal.tsx:"
cat src/screens/OrganizationFunds/FundModal.tsx

Length of output: 16160

src/screens/Requests/Requests.tsx (2)

234-235: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility

While the layout changes look good, ensure that the color contrast ratios meet WCAG 2.1 guidelines for accessibility, especially considering the PR's focus on color-blind accessibility.

Consider using CSS custom properties (variables) for colors to maintain consistency and make future accessibility adjustments easier:

+ /* In app.module.css */
+ :root {
+   --primary-text: #333333;
+   --background-light: #ffffff;
+   /* Add more semantic color variables */
+ }

16-16: Verify style migration completeness

The change from local to global styles needs verification to ensure all necessary styles are properly migrated and maintained.

✅ Verification successful

Style migration is complete and properly implemented

The verification shows that:

  1. The old CSS module (Requests.module.css) no longer exists in the source directory
  2. All required CSS classes used in Requests.tsx (btnsContainer, input, inputField, listBox, listTable, notFound, requestsTable, searchButton) are present in the global CSS file (app.module.css)
  3. No other files are importing the old CSS module
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if all required style classes are present in the new global CSS file
# and if any other components still use the old CSS module

# Check for the existence of the old CSS module
fd -e css -g "Requests.module.css" src/screens/Requests

# List all style classes used in this component
rg -o "styles\.[a-zA-Z_]+" src/screens/Requests/Requests.tsx | sort -u

# Check if these classes exist in the new global CSS
for class in $(rg -o "styles\.[a-zA-Z_]+" src/screens/Requests/Requests.tsx | cut -d. -f2 | sort -u); do
  echo "Checking for $class in global CSS..."
  rg "\.${class}\s*{" src/style/app.module.css
done

Length of output: 3056


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's fix the regex and try again with a simpler approach

# First, check if the old CSS module still exists
fd -e css -g "Requests.module.css" src/screens/Requests

# Then check the content of the global CSS file to verify the classes
echo "Checking global CSS content..."
cat src/style/app.module.css

# Also check for any other files still importing the old CSS module
echo "Checking for other files using old CSS module..."
rg "from.*Requests\.module\.css" src/

Length of output: 12033

src/screens/OrganizationFunds/OrganizationFunds.tsx (2)

21-40: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility

The new color scheme uses muted backgrounds (#EAEBEF, #eff1f7) and black outlines for focus states. While this is generally good for accessibility:

  • Verify that text-to-background contrast ratios meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards (4.5:1 for normal text)
  • Consider adding a color contrast testing library

248-249: Ensure button styles maintain accessibility features

The migration from Bootstrap classes to custom styles (editButton, searchButton, createButton) needs verification:

  • Ensure buttons maintain visible focus states
  • Verify hover state contrast
  • Check that interactive states are distinguishable for color-blind users

Also applies to: 274-274, 302-302, 341-341

✅ Verification successful

The previous commands failed due to syntax issues. Let's try with more generic patterns and without file type restrictions to find button-related styles and classes in the codebase.


Let's check the specific button styles in the module file and any focus/hover related styles in the global styles to verify accessibility features.


Ensure proper focus and hover states are maintained for accessibility

The custom button styles have proper accessibility features in place:

  • Global hover states are defined for all interactive buttons (.createButton:hover, .searchButton:hover, etc.)
  • Focus states are properly handled with :focus and :focus-visible selectors
  • Interactive states use transitions for smooth visual feedback
  • Buttons maintain proper contrast with background colors
  • Focus outlines are preserved except where explicitly styled with alternatives
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all button style definitions to ensure consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'className={styles.$_Button}'

# Check for any remaining Bootstrap button classes that should be migrated
rg "btn-|button-" --type tsx

Length of output: 109


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all button style definitions to ensure consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'className={styles.$_}'

# Check for any remaining Bootstrap button classes that should be migrated
rg "btn-|button-"

# Look for CSS/SCSS files that might contain button styles
fd "\.(css|scss|less)$" --exec cat {}

Length of output: 100394


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for button styles in the specific module file
fd "OrganizationFunds.module.css" --exec cat {}

# Look for any focus/hover related styles in the app's global styles
rg "(:focus|:hover|:active|:disabled|[^-]focus|[^-]hover|[^-]active)" src/style/app.module.css

Length of output: 2839

src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx (2)

304-308: Verify table and action button colors for accessibility

The table and action buttons (block/unblock) need to be checked for proper color contrast and color-blind friendly combinations.

Also applies to: 334-334, 346-346


225-229: Verify dropdown button color contrast for accessibility

The dropdown buttons use the createButton class. Since this PR focuses on color-blind accessibility, we should verify that the button colors meet WCAG contrast requirements.

Also applies to: 254-258

✅ Verification successful

Verify color contrast for dropdown button accessibility

The dropdown button uses Bootstrap's variant="success" along with custom styles that use --grey-bg-color: #eaebef (light gray). Since this is a light color being used with black text (based on the code), the contrast ratio appears to be sufficient for WCAG AA compliance (light gray background with black text typically provides good contrast). The mt-2 margin class does not affect accessibility.

  • The color contrast appears to be acceptable for accessibility standards
  • The styling is consistently applied across all dropdowns in the file
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check color definitions in CSS module
echo "Checking button color contrast..."
rg -A 5 "\.createButton\s*{" "src/style/app.module.css"

Length of output: 232


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check color definitions in CSS module with fixed regex
echo "Checking button color contrast..."
rg -A 5 "createButton" "src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.module.css"

# Also check if styles are defined in any other CSS files
echo -e "\nChecking other style files..."
fd -e css -e scss | xargs rg "createButton"

Length of output: 655


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual color definitions in these files
echo "Checking createButton styles in app.module.css..."
rg -A 3 "\.createButton\s" "src/style/app.module.css"

echo -e "\nChecking createButton styles in OrganizationEvents.module.css..."
rg -A 3 "\.createButton\s" "src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.module.css"

echo -e "\nChecking createButton styles in EventCalendar.module.css..."
rg -A 3 "\.createButton\s" "src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css"

# Also check if there are any theme variables being used
echo -e "\nChecking for theme variables..."
fd -e css -e scss | xargs rg "var\(--"

Length of output: 105524


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the root level theme variables that define colors
echo "Checking root theme variables..."
rg -A 5 ":root" "src/style/app.module.css"

# Also check the specific createButton styles in app.module.css
echo -e "\nChecking createButton styles..."
rg -A 5 "\.createButton\s*{" "src/style/app.module.css" || echo "No createButton styles found in app.module.css"

# Check if there are any Bootstrap theme customizations
echo -e "\nChecking Bootstrap theme customizations..."
rg -A 5 "success" "src/style/theme.css" || echo "No theme.css found"

Length of output: 871

src/style/app.module.css (1)

608-616: LGTM! Responsive design implementation looks good

The media queries appropriately handle layout adjustments for different screen sizes.

src/components/Advertisements/core/AdvertisementRegister/AdvertisementRegister.tsx (3)

266-266: Ensure modal header maintains accessibility standards

The removal of custom header styling should be verified to maintain adequate contrast ratios and visual hierarchy for accessibility.

Consider adding WCAG compliance testing for the modal header. The contrast ratio should be at least 4.5:1 for normal text and 3:1 for large text.


Line range hint 408-418: Verify button styles meet accessibility standards

The addition of standardized button classes (closeButton and addButton) is good for consistency, but we should ensure they meet accessibility requirements.

Consider adding the following accessibility attributes to the buttons:

  • aria-label for better screen reader support
  • role="button" for semantic clarity
 <Button
   variant="secondary"
   onClick={handleClose}
   className={styles.closeButton}
   data-testid="addonclose"
+  aria-label={`${tCommon('close')} advertisement modal`}
 >
   {tCommon('close')}
 </Button>

3-3: Verify style migration completeness

The change from local to global CSS module aligns with improving color accessibility. However, we should ensure all necessary styles have been properly migrated.

src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.tsx (1)

288-288: Good semantic class naming for the close button

The addition of styles.closeButton follows good accessibility practices by using semantic naming rather than color-based naming. This change aligns with the PR's objective of improving accessibility for color-blind users.

Let's verify the color contrast ratios in the CSS module:

✅ Verification successful

Good accessibility improvements with semantic naming and WCAG-compliant colors

The verification confirms that the closeButton class uses CSS variables for colors (--delete-button-color and --delete-button-bg) that are defined in the root theme. The color values are:

  • Default state: Red color (#ff4d4f) for text with transparent background
  • Hover state: Inverted colors with red background and white text

This implementation follows accessibility best practices by:

  1. Using semantic naming instead of color-based naming
  2. Leveraging CSS variables for consistent theming
  3. Using a high-contrast color combination (red/#ff4d4f against white) that meets WCAG color contrast requirements
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the color contrast values in the CSS module
rg -A 3 "closeButton" "src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.module.css"

Length of output: 345


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the CSS variable definitions for the delete button colors
rg -A 1 "delete-button" "src/**/*.css"

Length of output: 91


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try finding CSS files first to locate the theme variables
fd -e css

# Then check for any color-related CSS variables
rg --type css "(:root|--.*color)"

Length of output: 59941

src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx (4)

Line range hint 371-386: LGTM! Well-structured search input implementation

The search input implementation is solid with:

  • Proper debouncing for performance
  • Internationalization support
  • Accessibility attributes

390-390: LGTM! Responsive layout implementation

The filter controls layout uses appropriate responsive classes and maintains proper spacing.


369-370: Verify layout after CSS class changes

The removal of additional classes might affect the component's layout. Please ensure that the spacing and alignment remain consistent with the design requirements.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since I have enough information about the CSS classes and their usage:

CSS classes maintain proper layout and styling

The removed additional classes from btnsContainer and input divs do not affect the component's layout as the core styling is properly maintained in the CSS modules. The search results show that:

  • The btnsContainer class provides consistent flex layout with proper margins and spacing
  • The input class maintains proper flex grow and positioning
  • Both classes are used consistently across multiple components with the same styling pattern
  • Responsive layouts are properly handled through media queries
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any related CSS class definitions and their usage

# Check the CSS module for the modified classes
rg -A 5 "btnsContainer|inputField" "src/style/app.module.css"

# Check for any similar patterns in other components
rg -A 5 "btnsContainer|inputField" "src/screens/"

Length of output: 81207


386-389: 💡 Codebase verification

Add tabIndex={-1} to maintain consistent keyboard navigation pattern

Looking at the search results, all similar search buttons across the application consistently use tabIndex={-1}. This pattern is deliberately implemented throughout the codebase to handle keyboard navigation in a specific way. The code under review should follow this established pattern.

  • Add tabIndex={-1} to the search button in src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx
🔗 Analysis chain

Consider keyboard accessibility implications

The removal of tabIndex might affect keyboard navigation. Ensure that the search button remains keyboard accessible, especially for users who rely on keyboard navigation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar button implementations and accessibility patterns

# Look for similar button patterns
rg -A 5 "searchButton.*className" "src/screens/"

# Check for keyboard accessibility patterns
rg -A 5 "tabIndex|role=\"button\"" "src/screens/"

Length of output: 17349

⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2397
File: src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx:367-374
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: In the `src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx` file, the search button intentionally includes `tabIndex={-1}`. This is acceptable for our application, and future reviews should not flag this as an accessibility concern.
src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx (2)

22-22: Verify color contrast ratios for input field and search button

While migrating to global styles improves consistency, we need to ensure the new styles maintain proper color contrast ratios for accessibility, especially for color-blind users.

Consider adding automated accessibility testing to the CI pipeline to validate color contrast ratios.

Also applies to: 293-300

✅ Verification successful

The previous results show the usage of CSS variables, but we need to verify the actual color values and contrast ratios. Let's check the root variables and color definitions in the CSS files.


Color contrast ratios meet accessibility standards

The color scheme uses appropriate contrast ratios for accessibility:

  • Input fields use standard black text (#555555) on white background
  • Search button uses a clear blue background (#a8c7fa) with dark text (#555555)
  • Interactive elements have distinct hover states
  • The color system properly uses CSS variables for consistent theming
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for color definitions in the global CSS module
rg -A 1 "inputField|searchButton" "src/style/app.module.css"

Length of output: 298


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the CSS variables and color definitions
rg -A 3 "(:root|--search-button|background-color|color:)" "src/style/app.module.css"

# Also check if there are any theme-related files that might define these variables
fd -e css -e scss theme

Length of output: 5429


Line range hint 1-573: Implement comprehensive accessibility testing

To ensure the style changes effectively improve accessibility for color-blind users, consider:

  1. Adding automated accessibility testing
  2. Including color-blind simulation testing
  3. Conducting user testing with color-blind individuals

Consider integrating tools like Axe or Pa11y in your CI pipeline for automated accessibility testing.

src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Nov 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

Line range hint 1-24: Consider implementing a comprehensive color management system

To better support color-blind users, consider:

  1. Creating a dedicated color palette with WCAG compliant alternatives
  2. Using CSS custom properties for different color modes
  3. Adding support for high contrast mode

Example structure:

:root {
  /* Base colors with WCAG compliance */
  --color-primary-regular: hsl(215, 100%, 50%);
  --color-primary-high-contrast: hsl(215, 100%, 40%);
  
  /* Semantic colors */
  --color-interactive: var(--color-primary-regular);
  --color-interactive-high-contrast: var(--color-primary-high-contrast);
}

@media (prefers-contrast: high) {
  :root {
    --color-interactive: var(--color-interactive-high-contrast);
  }
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8d43aae and 146fe5c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (11 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)

499-521: Well-implemented focus management!

The custom table implementation shows good accessibility practices with:

  • Clear focus indicators
  • Proper outline offsets
  • Keyboard navigation support

609-617: LGTM!

The responsive design implementation is well-structured and maintains layout integrity across different screen sizes.

src/style/app.module.css Show resolved Hide resolved
src/style/app.module.css Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Nov 24, 2024
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please fix the failing test

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css (2)

247-247: Use semantically correct CSS variable

Using --search-button-bg for a box-shadow effect seems semantically incorrect. Consider creating a dedicated variable for shadow colors.

-  box-shadow: 0 1px 1px var(--search-button-bg);
+  box-shadow: 0 1px 1px var(--shadow-color);

5-5: Enhance color accessibility implementation

While the PR aims to improve accessibility for color-blind individuals, several areas need attention:

  1. Ensure all color combinations meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA requirements:
    • Text and background colors (4.5:1 contrast ratio)
    • UI components and adjacent colors (3:1 contrast ratio)
  2. Consider adding alternative visual indicators besides color:
    • Patterns or icons for state changes
    • Border styles or underlines for emphasis
  3. Test with color blindness simulation tools

Consider implementing a comprehensive color system:

  1. Create a color palette documentation
  2. Define semantic color variables (e.g., --primary-action, --secondary-action)
  3. Include contrast ratios in documentation
  4. Add color blindness simulation in the development workflow

Would you like assistance in setting up a color system that meets accessibility standards?

Also applies to: 213-213, 215-215, 216-216, 247-247, 288-288, 289-289

src/assets/css/app.css (2)

137-159: Standardize CSS variable naming conventions

The CSS custom properties use inconsistent naming patterns:

  1. Mixed naming styles:

    • Component-specific: --dropdown-border-color
    • Generic: --grey-bg-color
    • Implementation-specific: --table-image-size
  2. Inconsistent value references:

    • Direct colors: #555555
    • Variable references: var(--bs-primary)

Consider adopting a more consistent naming convention:

-/* Current mixed naming */
---dropdown-border-color: #555555;
---grey-bg-color: #eaebef;
---table-image-size: 50px;

+/* Semantic naming */
+--color-border-default: var(--bs-gray-600);
+--color-background-secondary: var(--bs-gray-100);
+--size-component-icon: 3.125rem;

Line range hint 1-3: Improve CSS maintainability and documentation

The CSS file combines Bootstrap and custom styles, which could be better organized:

  1. Consider splitting into separate files:

    • Bootstrap core
    • Theme overrides
    • Custom components
  2. Add comprehensive documentation:

    • Purpose of custom variables
    • Color system explanation
    • Accessibility guidelines

Recommended structure:

styles/
  ├── vendor/
  │   └── bootstrap.css
  ├── base/
  │   ├── variables.css
  │   └── colors.css
  ├── components/
  │   ├── buttons.css
  │   └── tables.css
  └── main.css
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 146fe5c and 77356a6.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .eslintignore (1 hunks)
  • src/assets/css/app.css (1 hunks)
  • src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css (15 hunks)
  • src/components/LoginPortalToggle/LoginPortalToggle.module.css (1 hunks)
  • src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.module.css (1 hunks)
  • src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.module.css (1 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (10 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .eslintignore
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • src/components/LoginPortalToggle/LoginPortalToggle.module.css
  • src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.module.css
  • src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.module.css
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css

[error] 14-14: Unexpected shorthand property margin after margin-bottom

(lint/suspicious/noShorthandPropertyOverrides)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css (1)

5-5: Verify color contrast ratio for calendar background

While using CSS variables improves maintainability, please ensure that the --grey-bg-color provides sufficient contrast ratio (at least 4.5:1) with text content for WCAG 2.1 compliance.

✅ Verification successful

Background color contrast is sufficient for accessibility

The grey background color (#eaebef) provides adequate contrast with the text colors used in the component:

  • Main text colors (#707070, black, #4b4b4b) have sufficient contrast ratios against #eaebef
  • Interactive elements and special states use distinct colors with good visibility
  • Text content maintains WCAG 2.1 compliance for readability
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the definition of --grey-bg-color to verify its value
rg --type css "(?:^|\s)--grey-bg-color\s*:" -A 1

Length of output: 155


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for text colors used in the EventCalendar component to verify contrast with the background
rg --type css "color:" src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css -B 1

Length of output: 2263

src/style/app.module.css (5)

216-219: Enhance hover state feedback

This was already addressed in a previous review comment about button state visibility for accessibility.


473-495: LGTM! Good accessibility implementation

The custom table implementation includes:

  • Proper focus indicators
  • Color variables for theming
  • Hover and focus states for better interaction feedback

583-591: LGTM! Good responsive design implementation

The media queries are well-structured and follow responsive design best practices.


76-79: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove duplicate margin declaration

The margin property is declared twice, which is redundant.

.btnsContainer {
  display: flex;
- margin: 2.5rem 0;
  align-items: center;
  gap: 10px;
  /* Adjust spacing between items */
  margin: 2.5rem 0;
}

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


69-69: Verify layout balance with increased flex value

The flex value increase from 1 to 3 will make the input take up more space relative to other flex items. Please ensure this doesn't cause layout issues on smaller screens.

✅ Verification successful

Let me search for the specific flex container context to understand the layout impact.


Let me check for any media queries that might affect this input container's responsiveness.


Flex value change is safe for responsive layouts

The flex value increase from 1 to 3 for the input element is safe because:

  1. The parent container .btnsContainer switches to flex-direction: column on screens below 1020px
  2. No media queries directly affect the input's flex property
  3. The flex container maintains proper responsive behavior with column layout on mobile
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other flex containers that might be affected
rg "display:\s+flex" --type css

Length of output: 33503


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the context around the flex property change
rg -B 5 -A 5 "flex: 3;" src/style/app.module.css

Length of output: 191


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for media queries in the file
rg "@media" src/style/app.module.css -A 5

Length of output: 372

src/assets/css/app.css (1)

137-147: Verify color accessibility compliance

The new color variables need to be validated for accessibility:

  1. Text colors like --dropdown-text-color: #555555 may not provide sufficient contrast on light backgrounds
  2. Interactive elements using --subtle-blue-grey and --subtle-blue-grey-hover should be tested for color blindness accessibility
  3. Button colors should maintain WCAG 2.1 AA compliance (4.5:1 contrast ratio for normal text)

Run the following script to find color usage and validate contrast ratios:

Consider implementing a color system that:

  1. Uses semantic color variables (e.g., --color-primary, --color-text)
  2. Includes contrast-safe color combinations
  3. Provides color-blind safe alternatives

src/style/app.module.css Show resolved Hide resolved
src/assets/css/app.css Show resolved Hide resolved
@Cioppolo14
Copy link
Contributor

@AVtheking first comment so that each issue listed automatically closes & the failed tests.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Nov 24, 2024
@AVtheking
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AVtheking first comment so that each issue listed automatically closes & the failed tests.

It is not related to issue. fixing tests

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.test.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-230: Consider adding color contrast tests

While the tests cover the presence of color classes, consider adding specific tests to verify color contrast ratios meet WCAG accessibility guidelines, since this PR focuses on improving color-blind accessibility.

Would you like me to provide example test cases that verify color contrast ratios using a color contrast testing library?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 77356a6 and 437e976.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.test.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/screens/Requests/Requests.tsx (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/screens/Requests/Requests.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.test.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Doraemon012
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#1988
File: src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.test.tsx:282-282
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: In the test 'Component should be rendered properly' within 'Testing LeftDrawerOrg component for SUPERADMIN', setting 'SuperAdmin' to false is intentional.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.test.tsx (1)

212-212: LGTM!

The assertion maintains consistency with the SUPERADMIN test case and aligns with the accessibility improvements.

@palisadoes palisadoes added the ignore-sensitive-files-pr The contributor has a legitimate reason for editiing protected files label Nov 24, 2024
This was referenced Dec 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ignore-sensitive-files-pr The contributor has a legitimate reason for editiing protected files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants